Risk Ledger / combined-holdings scheduleSheet EX · CU
Addition with a boundary
A sum is not a risk map.
Add the purchase values of two invented fully paid holdings: 4,000 CU and 600 CU. The result is combined purchase value, not current value or worst-case portfolio loss.
Same unit, different holdings
The second holding is invented solely to illustrate an addition. Its issuer and sector are unspecified.
- Holding A
- 4,000 CU80 × 50 CU/share
- Holding B
- 600 CU20 × 30 CU/share
- Combined
- 4,600 CUPurchase values before costs
- Overlap
- UnknownNo issuer or sector data
Combined-holdings schedule
EX / 05| Holding | Quantity / price | Purchase value | Not established |
|---|---|---|---|
| A / main exampleFully paid long shares | 80 shares × 50 CU/shareInvented entry inputs | 4,000 CUBefore costs | Current price, issuer, sector |
| B / second holdingAnother hypothetical holding | 20 shares × 30 CU/shareInvented entry inputs | 600 CUBefore costs | Current price, issuer, sector |
| A + B / sumCombined purchase values | Two separate holdings | 4,600 CU4,000 + 600 CU; arithmetic inference | Diversification or worst-case loss |
The 325 CU realised loss on Fills assumes Holding A was completely sold in a separate example. This schedule instead compares both invented purchase entries; do not treat them as simultaneous observed positions.
Why purchase values only?
Both rows use entry quantities times entry prices before costs. A current-value sum would require current prices that this static example does not provide.
Comparison, not conclusion
Limits compares this 4,600 CU sum with one invented combined-value boundary, while leaving concentration and outcomes unresolved.