Risk Ledger / boundary ledgerSheet LI · CU
Two arbitrary teaching inputs
A pass on paper is not protection.
Compare like units and like definitions. These invented personal boundaries are neither recommended levels nor regulatory requirements. Passing either comparison says nothing about a future fill or maximum loss.
Different measures
Combined purchase value is an entry-value sum. Price-only scenario loss is a chosen-price subtraction. Their 400 CU and 40 CU differences are not interchangeable.
- Value boundary
- 5,000 CUInvented combined-value limit
- Purchase sum
- 4,600 CUBefore costs
- Scenario boundary
- 200 CUInvented price-only limit
- Scenario loss
- 160 CUNot maximum loss
Boundary ledger
LI / 06| Measure | Invented boundary | Calculated example | Difference / exception |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01 / combined valuePurchase values of A + B | 5,000 CUSelf-chosen example, not prescribed | 4,600 CU4,000 + 600 CU before costs | 400 CU underNo inference about overlap or future value |
| 02 / price scenarioLoss at chosen 48 CU/share | 200 CUSelf-chosen price-only example, not prescribed | 160 CU80 × (50 − 48) CU; price-only | 40 CU underNot a maximum loss or exit promise |
| 03 / contrastInvented filled sale | 200 CU was for the scenario only | 325 CUSeparate filled-sale example incl. 5 CU stated costs | Exceeds 200 CU by 125 CUIllustrates why scenario comparison is no cap |
The filled-sale row is not a third boundary test or a predicted outcome. Its 325 CU assumes all 80 shares sold at 46 CU/share with invented 2 CU buy and 3 CU sale costs.
What a comparison can do
It can show whether one specified example is numerically above or below one specified invented boundary. It cannot certify an appropriate position or guarantee an outcome.
Keep the evidence separate
Read the source register for U.S.-specific guidance, publication dates, access date and a correction route that requires no invented contact address.